Monday, 4 November 2024

Responsibility without Authority.

Responsibility without Authority:

“…sometimes I’ve seen someone with the responsibility for a task but little or no authority to execute. Some tactics to deal with this would be helpful.

In that article, I pointed out the difference between responsibility and accountability by stating that responsibility can be shared, but accountability cannot. In addition to being responsible for something, when you’re accountable you, and you alone, are also answerable for your actions. You own the results.

Perhaps I should start by defining these three words—responsibility, accountability, and authority—that are so often used interchangeably. You may disagree with my definitions, but experience has shown me that confusion around these words, and the implications of not managing for each of them purposefully, is a cause for dysfunction in many organizations. Defining each the way I have provides a framework to begin to create more effective communication, healthier leadership, and a culture of accountability within your organization.

Responsibility is the duty and ability to respond or act. Giving someone responsibility for a task, process, or service means that it is the role of that person to do the work. It may be assigned to multiple people.

Accountability is made up of “account,” meaning to report or describe an event or experience, and “ability,” the means or skill to do something. So, it literally means the ability to report on events or experiences. The job of being accountable for something should be assigned to a single individual whose duty it is to monitor the performance of a specific task, process, department, or KPI. But, they are not necessarily responsible to do the work.

Authority is “the power or right to give orders and make decisions.” Many people can have authority in an organization, and there’s usually someone at the top, the owner, CEO, or Board of Directors who has or have the highest level of authority.

To be accountable for something without having the necessary authority is demoralizing, unproductive, and potentially leads to a toxic work environment. So, how can you avoid this in your organization?

As the person in charge, the solution is relatively easy. When you delegate responsibility, or make someone accountable for something, make sure you empower them with an appropriate measure of authority. Ceding ownership for decision-making can be difficult, but unless you want to set your delegate up for failure, they must be provided commensurate authority for giving orders and making decisions. The extent, and limits of their authority should be discussed with them before expecting them to accept the assignment or position, and recorded for future reference.

If you’re not sure what constitutes commensurate authority, start with something that seems reasonable and regularly meet with your delegate to ask for feedback. Together, you need to agree on the extent of authority necessary for them to get the job done effectively and independently.

But what if you’re the delegate and find yourself assigned to a position of ultimate accountability for a job or KPI, but given only limited, or no authority?

The best thing is to avoid the situation in the first place by discussing the need for commensurate authority with your supervisor before accepting the job. But if that’s not possible, the following can help you manage this untenable situation.

1.     Don’t stop leading. It’s not time to throw in the towel because you’re being micro-managed. And, you especially don’t want to make matters worse by complaining to your colleagues about the constraints you’re dealing with. Look at the glass as half full and celebrate what you’ve been able to accomplish. Share this information with colleagues instead.

2.     Talk about it. Not with your colleagues. With your supervisors. I know, it sounds too simple, but they may not realize they’re holding you back. Be clear, concise, and thoughtful about the challenges and risks you’re dealing with.

3.     Ask for support. Asking for what you need is important. If you never speak up, not only will you be risking success, but people will invariably ask why you didn’t say anything. Even if the answer is ultimately no, you need to go on record as having made your concerns known.

4.     Articulate your plan. Ensure that the people you report to understand your vision, plan, and expected outcomes. In your plan, be sure to include potential risks, and document everything. Ask for approval for your plan. Once you have it, move forward confidently.

5.     Stop asking for permission. Have you considered you may be in your own way? Sometimes we find ourselves without authority because we seek approval from above too often. Find things you can independently act on, then do it with confidence and competence. If you need to make quick decisions, make them. Inform others after and see what happens. As the saying goes, it is often easier to seek forgiveness than ask permission.

6.     Create a new path. If you are not empowered to move forward on the big vision, find what you are able to do and do it. Big wins are paved with small successes along the way. What do you have the authority to move on? What decisions can you act on today?

To ensure that only one person is answerable for a given task, project, team, department, KPI or other responsibility is the right step toward creating a culture of accountability in your organization. But, without equipping them with sufficient authority to get the job done, you’re almost surely setting them up to fail. It’s effectively dysfunctional delegation, bad management practice, and a good way to undermine your organization’s culture and the morale of your people.

 

Dysfunctional delegation

Dysfunctional delegation is a delegation practice that can lead to confusion, poor work quality, and missed deadlines. It can include: 

Bypass delegation

  • When a manager directly handles tasks instead of delegating them to the designated person. This can also be called "undermining delegation" or "managerial interference". 
Displaced delegation
  • When a manager assigns a task to a peer instead of the employee who is directly responsible for it. 
Poor task delegation
  • When a manager assigns tasks without considering the team member's skills, interests, workload, or goals. 
Responsibility without authority
  • When a manager assigns responsibility to someone without giving them the authority to do the job. 
Other signs of ineffective delegation include: 
Micromanaging, Unclear instructions, Frequent reassignment of tasks, Lack of feedback or accountability, and Employees feeling overwhelmed.